Thursday, 27 November 2014

Bartolotti unavailable to defend her complaint for Tribunal 27 Nov.

The Tribunal to hear Bartolotti’s allegation of defamation by Max Wallis was scheduled for 27th Nov.  Though fixed for several weeks, Bartolotti called off the internal Tribunal ten days before.
Pippa Bartolotti 
You might ask Bartolotti why she postponed and what she's doing when claiming 'not available'.  In fact she'd agreed on the 18th to attend the Welshpool 'energy debate' in the evening of the 27th (hardly feasible with the Tribunal in London), but then pulled out of that too.

This blog posts up the evidence provided from both sides for a Green-Party (England & Wales) Tribunal on Bartolotti's allegation of 'defamation' in May 2013.  She also complained about supplying a link to the satirical website pippabartolotti.info.  Her complaint raises the clash in Free Speech v. Censorship. The claim by Bartolotti's friends of 'bringing the Party into disrepute' fails, as the Newsletter is internal. Interfering in an internal election was another allegation. 
   Here is The offending Newsletter for readers to judge the defamation claim themselves.

 Max Wallis is disappointed at the postponement, pointing out the timing turned out embarrassing for Bartolotti, as she’s involved in the current ballot for Wales Green Party leader.  He points out he was suspended in July 2013 and the matter is only now coming to a Tribunal; in effect, 'suspension' is used as punishment without a hearing.  

Max Wallis Environmentalist 
In the Bartolotti case, the comments were in an internal Newsletter, which did not go public and was not used by political opponents.  She objected to a link to the critical website but that website had been public for months before.
Bartolotti’s complaint is of “defamation” (cf.  ‘undermined integrity’), so a higher hurdle.  Truthful statements are not defamatory, while ‘reasonable belief’ is a defence under the Defamation Act.

Tuesday, 18 November 2014

Wales Green Party Expulsion Newsletter 2

                               
Wales GP Members Newsletter, May 2013, 
                                         including the 'complaint' item and link
Editor’s Note
The previous Newsletter in March provoked some indignant reactions to my re-printing an item on GPRC secret court, which reported the expulsion of two GP activists;  also to my printing a tweet from #GreenLeaksUK.  A Cardiff Branch meeting even demanded that I be expelled, ignoring the GP procedure on complaints that the Branch itself had adopted.  As Editor, I listen to responses, but make no apologies for editorial decisions within the remit laid down for the post.
The GPRC co-chairs under pressure agreed to reconsider the expulsions at their meeting in June

Letter to the Editor                           questions to Pippa Bartolotti 
The Green Party tries to ensure our candidates for public office have no skeletons that might come out later. Can I pose questions on Pippa Bartolotti's explanations given during the GP leadership campaign, for her responsibility as director of Toucan Systems of Abertillery in supplying Thales military weapons company (UK’s second largest defence electronics supplier)?
She wrote of “one replacement keyboard for Thales... a nuclear establishment... equipment in a reactor environment”. That doesn't ring true - one keyboard for an nuclear weapons company!
Another company, Encrypta Electronics had AB Electronics of Abercynon as their major subcontractor, who in recent years assisted Thales in equiping the new Warthog tanks for use in Afghanistan. Pippa was director/manager and also part owner of Encrypta, and described it as:
“I worked for Encrypta Electronics, a Newport–based company which manufactured and sold electronic devices which were to be fitted to the backs of lorries... a miniaturised version was used on ballot boxes... AWRE (had) one of these on trial... I left the company soon afterwards”.
AWRE, the UK's atomic weapons (research) establishment, say they engaged Encrypta as consultant on security tags and seals for atomic weapons. If this was for the nuclear weapons control treaty, could she be up-front and proud of it?
How does Pippa describe the sale of half or more of the family company Encrypta, then it going bankrupt in 2003, but the security locks business continuing under new ownership (Unisto)?
Name and address supplied

Pippa Bartolotti's nomination form says nothing on the above - as Editor, I asked Pippa if she’d supply a response.  She declined with:  I will not answer questions from those hiding behind anonymity. My statements on all these issues and more are in the public domain. Why not refer the member in question to those?           Pippa circulated it to the WGP Council, who asked that her previous answer be reproduced in full (Annex below).        Other unverified information at  pippabartolotti.info/  and en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pippa_Bartolotti‎.                   


ANNEX  Answers 3rd July 2012 by  Pippa Bartolotti

Answer to the Thales question
The world is not a perfect place, and we have to work with reality, not some
precious fantasy that there even exists a squeaky clean world. Toucan design
man-machine interfaces - the main business was in catering and hospital
equipment. Keeping good quality jobs in the valleys community of Abertillery
was something I was proud to do. In my time the company made one replacement
keyboard for Thales. You might think it would have been better to let a
nuclear establishment carry on with faulty equipment, but as Toucan was the
only company with the expertise to do the job, we erred on the side of
safety. Yes, between a rock and a hard place - but life is full of hard
decisions and no time to prevaricate. Would we have been right to allow
unsafe equipment in a reactor environment ? Of course not.

Answer to Encrypta question
I worked for Encrypta Electronics, which was set up in the recession of 1984.
It was a Newport–based company which employed 25 people, had a profit
sharing scheme and a turnover of about £2M. The business manufactured and
sold electronic devices which were to be fitted to the backs of lorries for the
avoidance of ‘shrinkage’(stuff falling off the backs of lorries). Customers were
Marks and Spencer, Mothercare and similar.

Over time we brought out a miniaturised version which was used on ballot
boxes in Spain. A request from AWRE to the sales dept resulted in them
having one of these on trial. It did not stand up to the conditions(whatever
they were) . The story ended there, and I left the company soon afterwards.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I