Max Evidence 3[30] Complaint toSOC=EamonnWard overJMexclusion 2011].

Max Evidence 3[30] Complaint toSOC=EamonnWard overJMexclusion 2011].

From: Max Wallis
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2011 6:26 PM
Subject: Re: complaint to SOC over exclusion from Wales GP meeting at Conference

Eamonn Ward, GP SOC
Hi Eamonn,
I note that 'Wales GP' have declined to respond, apparently not wishing to go further than the views from Ann Were to Anne Greagsby (my partner), which Ann never sent me.
It's clear from Ann's argument that under the constitution the WGP Council had the option of inviting me to stay to the meeting, but they were not given that chance. Anne was not given opportunity to explain why I should be invited - on grounds that she needed support in view of stress from serious bullying by John Matthews at the recent Cardiff GP meeting that had become personal,; and on grounds that my e-mail to Jake Griffiths (which had been 'furiously' attacked by John Matthews attack) would come up.
Ann does not address the issue that the WGP Council not JM as General Secretary had the right under the Constitution to invite me to stay or not. She presumably remembers that JM claimed the Constitution supported him and said he'd supply Anne with the actual terms, though it doesn't and he didn't.
In the event, JM did bring up that e-mail and name me in the course of the meeting; also it was quite a heated meeting which gave Anne a deal of stress, so why did Ann not conclude in retrospect that inviting me to stay would have been arguable? Instead she just comments “I don't think it's reasonable” in principle for non-members to attend, despite this being open in the Constitution.
On the point of the issue being ignored in the draft Minutes, Ann does say she's no objection to it being included and the Minute Secretary has agreed to ask other attendees too (e-mails below between Anne and Chris Simpson).
I should add that JM seems to have built up antagonism to me since getting furious (his word) with Anne over my email to Jake. At the last Cardiff GP meeting, he shouted down the stairs at Anne to tell Max - he's not to come to another GP meeting (unless joining as a member). He says the 'open invitation' to non-members is for a trial period only - yet I only ever attended that one Cardiff meeting (after helping in the election campaign) and that shouting match run by a furious chairman could not constitute a reasonable trial, but more an occasion for apology.
I'm pleased at least that the WGP agree they should account to you/SOC on my exclusion of from their meeting at Sheffield. I don't know if you could do any more on it, apart from reminding them of the general policy on welcoming/involving non-member friends. The underlying issues between Anne and JM, and in facing up to the disappointing election performance need to be addressed separately. But you might refer it further up in the structure as an indication of the Welsh Party straying from diversity and openness aims, with the leading members unwilling to challenge autocratic behaviour by the 'General Secretary'.
Thanks and best wishes / max
Max Wallis 029 2021 0708
48 Westbourne Road, Penarth CF64 3HF

--- On Tue, 20/9/11, ann were <ann_were12@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
From: ann were <ann_were12@yahoo.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Meeting minutes & no mention of Max being expelled from meeting
To: Chris simpson, "A GREAGSBY" <annegre@btinternet.com>
Date: Tuesday, 20 September, 2011, 11:19
Dear Anne,
The constitution says:-
v) The WGPC shall meet at least four times per year within Wales. Additional
meetings may be held outside of Wales (for example, at GPEW Conference) at
the discretion of the General Secretary. Meetings within Wales will be
rotated between the regions on a regular basis. *These meetings shall be
open to all members of the Party as observers, and the WGPC may invite any
person to attend as an advisor. *Meetings of WGPC shall be convened by the
General Secretary and publicised in Green Wales.
Max was not invited and, therefore, not entitled to attend. When/if he ever joins the Party he will be welcome to attend. I don't think it's reasonable to allow non members to attend WGPC meetings where we may wish to discuss private issues, such as election strategy and target wards, etc.
It's probably not reasonable to allow non members to attend local meetings either, on a regular basis, for the same reason.






From: chris
Subject: Re: Meeting minutes & no mention of Max being expelled from meeting
To: "A GREAGSBY" <annegre@btinternet.com>
Date: Saturday, 17 September, 2011, 17:54
I did not minute it because it was not part of the meeting. The minutes start off with 1) Apologies and carry on with the rest of the meeting. Present includes members of the council & observers is WGPC members who are not Council members. Sometimes I do get people in the wrong section; but I got the people there right this time.
If you want, I will circulate this round the rest of the Council members and ask them if they think this should be added to the minutes.
Yours,
Chris S

----- Original Message -----
From: A GREAGSBY
Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2011 5:43 PM
Subject: Re: Meeting minutes & no mention of Max being expelled from meeting

The minutes say nothing on this issue, so please add something based on my notes as follow:
The meeting began with the minute silence and then John Matthews asked if any one present was 'not a fully paid up member'. Max said he wasn't a member and understood that Non members are welcome to attend Conference as 'Observers'. John Matthews then demanded that Dr Max Wallis leave the meeting insisting that he had the right to do so by the Green Party constitution but was unable to quote the section. In response to my question he promised to send me the relevant reference.

best wishes

Anne



From: "Eamonn Ward"
Date: 02/10/2011 12:23
Subject: Fw: complaint to SOC over exclusion from Wales GP meeting at Conference

Max,
Wales GP have now contacted me. They have declined to respond and they refer you to the response given previously to Anne Greagsby.
 Regards
Eamonn



From: Eamonn Ward
Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2011 9:05 AM
Subject: Re: complaint to SOC over exclusion from Wales GP meeting at Conference

Max,

I forwarded your e-mail to Ann Were requesting that I be copied in on any response so I know it has been responded to. I have yet to receive a response but hope that Ann will get back to you soon.

Regards
Eamonn
----- Original Message -----
From: Max Wallis
Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2011 12:01 AM
Subject: Re: complaint to SOC over exclusion from Wales GP meeting at Conference

Hi Eamonn 
Thanks for taking up my complaint over John Matthews excluding me, among your many conference duties.
Reading the Wales GP Constitution, I see exclusion from a Wales Council meeting was not in accordance with it – whether a non-member can attend or be invited to speak is for the WGP Council itself to determine. It may not have been a proper Council meeting (notified to members and quorate), when your more positive rules on non-members attending would apply.

John Matthews did say he'd send chapter and verse to Anne (who'd objected, saying he made up rules) but hasn't done so.  Instead, the draft Minutes ignore the whole issue.

Best wishes / Max Wallis

-----Max Wallis/smamkw/CardiffUniversity wrote: -----
To: eamonn.ward
From: Max Wallis/smamkw/CardiffUniversity
Date: 11/09/2011 16:03
Subject: complaint to SOC over exclusion from GP meeting at Conference

My exclusion from the Wales GP meeting, Sat. 10th at 14.30.

At the start of the meeting, the chair (John Matthews) insisted that I, as non -member, should leave the meeting.  He stated he could do that under the constitution, but was unable to cite the rule or give specific reason.

I understand that a GP meeting may vote to exclude a non-member, allowing arguments for and against, but clearly this procedure was not followed.

I would add that at the August meeting of the Cardiff & Vale GP, I said he had misunderstood an e-mail that I wrote, in his attack on another for it, but he ruled that my contributions to the meeting should not be recorded/minuted.  JM subsequently at this Conference meeting referred to my email and me by name.  His action as chairman in excluding me was clearly not unbiased, but influenced by this previous episode.  Prior to this, I've had little contact with JM, having only helped in campaigning for the GP in the Welsh Assembly election last April-May,  so I am disturbed at the departure from openness policy evident in this exclusion.

Max Wallis   029 2021 0708
48 Westbourne Road, Penarth CF64 3HF 






No comments:

Post a Comment